Wednesday, September 3, 2008

Not Even Pretending

Wow! No preferential treatment there is there? Of course, this is fair and just reporting. After all, should it matter or be influential at all that the publisher of this magazine, Jann Wenner, is a major contributor to Obama's campaign? Nooooooo, of course not!!

Palin's speech is tonight. I hope I get to hear it. If it is like last night, the network's "talking heads" will be too busy with their commentary tearing her apart and talking over her (like they did Fred Thompson) for me to get to hear a word of her speech.

10 comments:

Dr. Wifey said...

that's not biased *eyes rolling*

Sandi said...

I'm sure if Michelle Obama was as sketchy as Sarah Palin, her cover story would be just as bad. Would you rather they just not report what's going on with Sarah Palin? Honestly? They wouldn't be doing their jobs if they ignored or glossed over all the scandal around her. If you want the tip of that iceberg, read my moms blog about her. McCain's people didn't do their research AT ALL before she was chosen, and it's coming back to bite them.

What has Michelle Obama done that puts her even remotely in the same light as Sarah Palin? Mrs. Obama hasn't had any nasty little skeletons come rattling out of her closet. I guarantee you if she did, it would not go unnoticed. The Republicans and the right are salivating at the thought of tarnishing the Obamas' reputations. Faux News would be all over it.

HEATHER said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0sYZZYw7-U
Deanna, here's Fred. It was AMAZING!! I truly LOVE him.
Don't you get C-Span? That is what we've been watching since there are no talking heads!
Regarding Michelle Obama-All you need to know is that she is a product of the dirty Cook County Politics. Her dad was a city worker-you don't get a city job in Chicago without being a part of the machine! They can't say she isn't a part of the dirty Chicago machine, she and Barry are eaten up with it!

Deanna said...

And there definitely isn't a liberal slant at ALL. Especially considering several of the major networks are HUGE contributors to Obama's campaign and were the first to jump on the slandering of Palin. Because we all know that it is a crime to have a daughter who gets pregnant and decides to get married and keep the baby.

Lisa@BlessedwithGrace said...

Wow, those magazine covers are impressive, hummm.
Hey, thanks for the advice regarding Grace's chewing habits. Hubby and I are actually thinking about wrapping the bed in towels and taping them in place. So, now that you suggested it, I am thinking, we really need to do that. It is the best idea, so far.

Supermom said...

Now since Wifey pointed out Obama's lips that's all I can focus on, LOL

Deanna said...

Just to further substantiate my thoughts on this preferential treatment.... the Media Research Center has recently come out and stated that NBC News is just one of the networks that has given such obvious lopsided pro-Obama coverage. They found that during the campaign they showed pro-Obama coverage vs. negative Obama coverage was shown 10 to one. That is a pretty astounding number! The MRC say this is a pretty standard finding across the networks.

But, no, they aren't biased. Like Wifey said.... eyes rolling!

Sandi said...

Oh, don't fret ... the right has its own (very prominent) news outlet. You act as if the whole media world is out to get your candidates. Honey, that's not the case at all. I referenced Faux News ... I'm going to hazard a guess that that's your news channel of choice, for obvious reasons.

Wyatt Earp said...

Forgive me for saying this, but Michelle Obama in not an attractive woman. At all.

Deanna said...

You are forgiven. To each his own.